|
No.
Dipoles Present
|
Reflector
Width (lambda)
|
Reflector
Height (lambda)
|
Dipole-Dipole
Spacing (s, s')
|
|
1
|
1.3
|
1.16
|
-
|
|
2
|
1.3
|
1.16
|
0.48lambda
|
|
3
|
1.4
|
1.26
|
0.6lambda
|
|
4
|
1.7
|
1.53
|
0.48lambda,
0.12lambda
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 1:
Gain vs Reflector-Dipole Spacing (d)
|
Figure 2:
Bandwidth vs Reflector-Dipole Spacing (d)
|
Alternatively, the gain and
bandwidth characteristics can be related to the dipole-dipole
spacing (figure 3 and figure 4), with reflector dimensions
and s' as stated in the table above, and reflector-dipole
spacing set at 0.16lambda. These curves are only useful
for the two and four dipole cases.
|
|
|
Figure
3: Gain vs Dipole-Dipole Spacing (s)
|
Figure
4: Bandwidth vs Dipole-Dipole Spacing (s)
|
Example
An antenna with
the following specifications is required:
* minimum gain
of 12 dBi
* minimum bandwidth of 30%
* centre operating frequency of 675Mhz
From figure
1, both three and four dipoles are able satisfy the required
gain. However, three dipoles do not produce sufficient bandwidth
and four dipoles are therefore used, with a reflector dipole
spacing of 0.2 lambda producing a bandwidth of 40% (from
figure 2).
The antenna
therefore has the following characteristics:
* Gain of 12dBi
* Bandwidth of 40%
* Dipole-Dipole Spacing of s = 0.48 lambda (213mm) and s'
= 0.12 lambda(53mm)
* Reflector-Dipole Spacing of 0.2 lambda (89mm)
* Reflector of 1.7 lambda(756mm) wide and 1.53 lambda (680mm)
high.
Note: these design curves provide only a rough estimate
of a particular antenna's dimensions and performance. In
order to fully specify the antenna it should be simulated,
using the values obtained from the curves if so desired.
Home
Price List Contact Us Download
News Info
Applications
Top of Page
Reference:
Fourth Year Design Report, "Investigate the Design
of Dipoles in front of a Reflector Plane" prepared
by Deo Dusabe for the School of Electrical and Information
Engineering, University of the Witwatersrand, August 2003.